Citicorp Following Attanasio Lead In Parmalat Litigation


Maybe I should have copyrighted the term “dupe” when it comes to playing dumb to get off the hook in these accounting fraud cases.  Looks like Citicorp’s lawyers see a winner, too,  in the strategy Mr. Attanasio used to get Mr. Stulac of Arthur Andersen  off the hook in the Peregrine case.

They actually use the word, “Dupe” with reporters!
Who’s next?
Maybe Grant Thornton, EY and PwC in the Refco case?
Mr. Attanasio: Let me know if they call.  I’ll take my commission in cash.
Parmalat’s CEO, Dr. Enrico Bondi, who is suing on behalf of Parmalat, claims Citi bankers were complicit in the company’s meltdown by helping Parmalat insiders loot the company and conceal off-balance-sheet debt. Bondi’s lawyer, Kenneth Chiate of Quinn Emanuel in L.A., said in his opening that the bankers were driven by “greed” and wanted to make “higher bonuses and higher salaries through making loans to a company” — i.e. Parmalat — “that they shouldn’t have been making.” Bondi is suing Citi for $2.2 billion.

But Citi’s lawyer — Paul Weiss’s Ted Wells — said in his opening that the bank lost more money than any other creditor as a result of the fraud committed by the allegedly corrupt insiders at Parmalat. “Citigroup was the biggest victim,” Wells said. “We were the biggest dupe. We were the biggest sucker and it was embarrassing.” Citi is seeking $699 million in counterclaims in the New Jersey case, which, reports Bray, is expected to last up to three months. Wells said the bank made only about $131 million in fees in about nine years of working with Parmalat. The bank has since recovered about $330 million it lost due to the fraud, Wells said.

2 replies

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. […] It has been asserted at times with success. It’s being used more and more and more and more. But it smacks of the “have your cake and eat it too” attitude pervasive in C-level corporate […]

  2. […] there a defense that’s more embarrassing for the accounting firms than “We were duped?”  Yes.  It will now be called the “Wedding Planner”  defense, intended to excuse […]

Comments are closed.